Comments on: Interesting Soldier Theories http://tf2.digitaljedi.com/2008/interesting-soldier-theories/ Tue, 23 Feb 2010 01:04:20 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Spotpuff http://tf2.digitaljedi.com/2008/interesting-soldier-theories/comment-page-1/#comment-781 Spotpuff Fri, 16 May 2008 18:14:44 +0000 http://tf2.digitaljedi.com/2008/interesting-soldier-theories/#comment-781 We've played a few scrims, too, and they tend to have rules in place like 7v7 or "highlander" (one of each class) so yes, there are artificial rules in place. I think no one would argue engineers are horribly weak on certain CP maps in scrim play so no one uses them, but that's a separate issue entirely. Thanks for the link, lunk. I'm glad to see more TF1 clans around :) We’ve played a few scrims, too, and they tend to have rules in place like 7v7 or “highlander” (one of each class) so yes, there are artificial rules in place. I think no one would argue engineers are horribly weak on certain CP maps in scrim play so no one uses them, but that’s a separate issue entirely.

Thanks for the link, lunk. I’m glad to see more TF1 clans around :)

]]> By: cdtrix http://tf2.digitaljedi.com/2008/interesting-soldier-theories/comment-page-1/#comment-780 cdtrix Fri, 16 May 2008 16:18:32 +0000 http://tf2.digitaljedi.com/2008/interesting-soldier-theories/#comment-780 Spotpuff's points are solely based on pubs simply because that's how Valve balances the classes. It would be quite different if they used clan matches for balancing but that doesn't work since clan matches consist of approximately 10% of the time played in TF2. They must cater to the rest of the 90% that play in pubs. Spotpuff’s points are solely based on pubs simply because that’s how Valve balances the classes. It would be quite different if they used clan matches for balancing but that doesn’t work since clan matches consist of approximately 10% of the time played in TF2. They must cater to the rest of the 90% that play in pubs.

]]>